Review





Similar Products

97
MathWorks Inc stochastic simulations
(A) Pulsing (blue) and constant (orange) 0A~P signal used as input to the biofilm matrix production <t>stochastic</t> model. Pulsing signal corresponds to the signal for growth rate equal to 0.4 h −1 predicted by the phosphorelay network model. The constant 0A~P signal corresponds to the mean of the pulsing signal. (B) Stochastic simulations starting from biofilm matrix inactive state for both constant and pulsing 0A~P signal. Matrix production is considered inactive if the number of TapA molecules < 200 (dashed line). (C) Stochastic simulations starting from matrix active state for both constant and pulsing 0A~P signal. Matrix production is considered active if the number of TapA molecules ≥ 200 (dashed line). (D) Fraction of active cells as a function of time for constant (dark orange) and pulsing 0A~P signal (dark blue) estimated from fitting and to the stochastic simulation data of ‘ Initially OFF cells ’ (light blue) and ‘ Initially ON’ (light orange) cells, respectively. All fits have R 2 >= 0.77 and MSE < 0.005. A total of 2000 simulations were performed. (inset) Estimated values of the biofilm activation rate ( k ON ) and of the matrix deactivation rate assuming pulsing and constant 0A~P input .
Stochastic Simulations, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/stochastic simulations/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
stochastic simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
MathWorks Inc matlab simbiology simulation
(A) Pulsing (blue) and constant (orange) 0A~P signal used as input to the biofilm matrix production <t>stochastic</t> model. Pulsing signal corresponds to the signal for growth rate equal to 0.4 h −1 predicted by the phosphorelay network model. The constant 0A~P signal corresponds to the mean of the pulsing signal. (B) Stochastic simulations starting from biofilm matrix inactive state for both constant and pulsing 0A~P signal. Matrix production is considered inactive if the number of TapA molecules < 200 (dashed line). (C) Stochastic simulations starting from matrix active state for both constant and pulsing 0A~P signal. Matrix production is considered active if the number of TapA molecules ≥ 200 (dashed line). (D) Fraction of active cells as a function of time for constant (dark orange) and pulsing 0A~P signal (dark blue) estimated from fitting and to the stochastic simulation data of ‘ Initially OFF cells ’ (light blue) and ‘ Initially ON’ (light orange) cells, respectively. All fits have R 2 >= 0.77 and MSE < 0.005. A total of 2000 simulations were performed. (inset) Estimated values of the biofilm activation rate ( k ON ) and of the matrix deactivation rate assuming pulsing and constant 0A~P input .
Matlab Simbiology Simulation, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab simbiology simulation/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab simbiology simulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
MathWorks Inc simbiology simulations
(A) Pulsing (blue) and constant (orange) 0A~P signal used as input to the biofilm matrix production <t>stochastic</t> model. Pulsing signal corresponds to the signal for growth rate equal to 0.4 h −1 predicted by the phosphorelay network model. The constant 0A~P signal corresponds to the mean of the pulsing signal. (B) Stochastic simulations starting from biofilm matrix inactive state for both constant and pulsing 0A~P signal. Matrix production is considered inactive if the number of TapA molecules < 200 (dashed line). (C) Stochastic simulations starting from matrix active state for both constant and pulsing 0A~P signal. Matrix production is considered active if the number of TapA molecules ≥ 200 (dashed line). (D) Fraction of active cells as a function of time for constant (dark orange) and pulsing 0A~P signal (dark blue) estimated from fitting and to the stochastic simulation data of ‘ Initially OFF cells ’ (light blue) and ‘ Initially ON’ (light orange) cells, respectively. All fits have R 2 >= 0.77 and MSE < 0.005. A total of 2000 simulations were performed. (inset) Estimated values of the biofilm activation rate ( k ON ) and of the matrix deactivation rate assuming pulsing and constant 0A~P input .
Simbiology Simulations, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/simbiology simulations/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simbiology simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
MathWorks Inc simbiology simulation module
(A) Pulsing (blue) and constant (orange) 0A~P signal used as input to the biofilm matrix production <t>stochastic</t> model. Pulsing signal corresponds to the signal for growth rate equal to 0.4 h −1 predicted by the phosphorelay network model. The constant 0A~P signal corresponds to the mean of the pulsing signal. (B) Stochastic simulations starting from biofilm matrix inactive state for both constant and pulsing 0A~P signal. Matrix production is considered inactive if the number of TapA molecules < 200 (dashed line). (C) Stochastic simulations starting from matrix active state for both constant and pulsing 0A~P signal. Matrix production is considered active if the number of TapA molecules ≥ 200 (dashed line). (D) Fraction of active cells as a function of time for constant (dark orange) and pulsing 0A~P signal (dark blue) estimated from fitting and to the stochastic simulation data of ‘ Initially OFF cells ’ (light blue) and ‘ Initially ON’ (light orange) cells, respectively. All fits have R 2 >= 0.77 and MSE < 0.005. A total of 2000 simulations were performed. (inset) Estimated values of the biofilm activation rate ( k ON ) and of the matrix deactivation rate assuming pulsing and constant 0A~P input .
Simbiology Simulation Module, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/simbiology simulation module/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simbiology simulation module - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
MathWorks Inc simulations matlab simbiology 2018
Fig. 2. In vivo Near Infrared Imaging following Subcutaneous Administration. C57/black mice were administered SA + saline, SA-bNP or bNP + saline SC into the right footpad ( n = 3 each group). Injection volume was 40 μL in each group through a 28G needle. SA was loaded onto bNPs by incubation with an approximately 2x molar excess of SA: bNP surface biotin for 30 minutes. Unbound SA was washed from particles by centrifugation and decanting supernatant 2x. SA + saline was injected at the calculated maximum biotin binding on bNPs. T = 0 SA + saline dose was higher than SA-bNP dose due to incomplete binding of SA on bNP and washing steps to remove unbound SA. Observed fluorescence in the 700 nm channel for SA + saline (A) and SA in SA-bNP (B), and in the 800nm channel for bNP in SA-bNP (C) and unloaded bNPs (D). Normalized injection site elimination profiles vs time for SA + Saline (E ), SA in SA-bNP (F) bNP in SA-bNP (G ), and bNP + saline (H). I, Elimination rate constants from injection site. Data was fitted to a 1-compartment PK model utilizing <t>Matlab</t> symbiology. J, Area under the curve for free and bound SA in the injection site were calculated from concentration vs time data. ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗p < 0.05, < 0.01, and < 0.001 respectively, by 1-way ANOVA or two-tailed T-test.
Simulations Matlab Simbiology 2018, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/simulations matlab simbiology 2018/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulations matlab simbiology 2018 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
MathWorks Inc nicotine pharmacokinetic simulations
Fig. 2. In vivo Near Infrared Imaging following Subcutaneous Administration. C57/black mice were administered SA + saline, SA-bNP or bNP + saline SC into the right footpad ( n = 3 each group). Injection volume was 40 μL in each group through a 28G needle. SA was loaded onto bNPs by incubation with an approximately 2x molar excess of SA: bNP surface biotin for 30 minutes. Unbound SA was washed from particles by centrifugation and decanting supernatant 2x. SA + saline was injected at the calculated maximum biotin binding on bNPs. T = 0 SA + saline dose was higher than SA-bNP dose due to incomplete binding of SA on bNP and washing steps to remove unbound SA. Observed fluorescence in the 700 nm channel for SA + saline (A) and SA in SA-bNP (B), and in the 800nm channel for bNP in SA-bNP (C) and unloaded bNPs (D). Normalized injection site elimination profiles vs time for SA + Saline (E ), SA in SA-bNP (F) bNP in SA-bNP (G ), and bNP + saline (H). I, Elimination rate constants from injection site. Data was fitted to a 1-compartment PK model utilizing <t>Matlab</t> symbiology. J, Area under the curve for free and bound SA in the injection site were calculated from concentration vs time data. ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗p < 0.05, < 0.01, and < 0.001 respectively, by 1-way ANOVA or two-tailed T-test.
Nicotine Pharmacokinetic Simulations, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nicotine pharmacokinetic simulations/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nicotine pharmacokinetic simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
MathWorks Inc model simulations
Fig. 2. In vivo Near Infrared Imaging following Subcutaneous Administration. C57/black mice were administered SA + saline, SA-bNP or bNP + saline SC into the right footpad ( n = 3 each group). Injection volume was 40 μL in each group through a 28G needle. SA was loaded onto bNPs by incubation with an approximately 2x molar excess of SA: bNP surface biotin for 30 minutes. Unbound SA was washed from particles by centrifugation and decanting supernatant 2x. SA + saline was injected at the calculated maximum biotin binding on bNPs. T = 0 SA + saline dose was higher than SA-bNP dose due to incomplete binding of SA on bNP and washing steps to remove unbound SA. Observed fluorescence in the 700 nm channel for SA + saline (A) and SA in SA-bNP (B), and in the 800nm channel for bNP in SA-bNP (C) and unloaded bNPs (D). Normalized injection site elimination profiles vs time for SA + Saline (E ), SA in SA-bNP (F) bNP in SA-bNP (G ), and bNP + saline (H). I, Elimination rate constants from injection site. Data was fitted to a 1-compartment PK model utilizing <t>Matlab</t> symbiology. J, Area under the curve for free and bound SA in the injection site were calculated from concentration vs time data. ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗p < 0.05, < 0.01, and < 0.001 respectively, by 1-way ANOVA or two-tailed T-test.
Model Simulations, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/model simulations/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
model simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
MathWorks Inc multiple stochastic simulation algorithms ssa
Fig. 2. In vivo Near Infrared Imaging following Subcutaneous Administration. C57/black mice were administered SA + saline, SA-bNP or bNP + saline SC into the right footpad ( n = 3 each group). Injection volume was 40 μL in each group through a 28G needle. SA was loaded onto bNPs by incubation with an approximately 2x molar excess of SA: bNP surface biotin for 30 minutes. Unbound SA was washed from particles by centrifugation and decanting supernatant 2x. SA + saline was injected at the calculated maximum biotin binding on bNPs. T = 0 SA + saline dose was higher than SA-bNP dose due to incomplete binding of SA on bNP and washing steps to remove unbound SA. Observed fluorescence in the 700 nm channel for SA + saline (A) and SA in SA-bNP (B), and in the 800nm channel for bNP in SA-bNP (C) and unloaded bNPs (D). Normalized injection site elimination profiles vs time for SA + Saline (E ), SA in SA-bNP (F) bNP in SA-bNP (G ), and bNP + saline (H). I, Elimination rate constants from injection site. Data was fitted to a 1-compartment PK model utilizing <t>Matlab</t> symbiology. J, Area under the curve for free and bound SA in the injection site were calculated from concentration vs time data. ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗p < 0.05, < 0.01, and < 0.001 respectively, by 1-way ANOVA or two-tailed T-test.
Multiple Stochastic Simulation Algorithms Ssa, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/multiple stochastic simulation algorithms ssa/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multiple stochastic simulation algorithms ssa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Pulsing (blue) and constant (orange) 0A~P signal used as input to the biofilm matrix production stochastic model. Pulsing signal corresponds to the signal for growth rate equal to 0.4 h −1 predicted by the phosphorelay network model. The constant 0A~P signal corresponds to the mean of the pulsing signal. (B) Stochastic simulations starting from biofilm matrix inactive state for both constant and pulsing 0A~P signal. Matrix production is considered inactive if the number of TapA molecules < 200 (dashed line). (C) Stochastic simulations starting from matrix active state for both constant and pulsing 0A~P signal. Matrix production is considered active if the number of TapA molecules ≥ 200 (dashed line). (D) Fraction of active cells as a function of time for constant (dark orange) and pulsing 0A~P signal (dark blue) estimated from fitting and to the stochastic simulation data of ‘ Initially OFF cells ’ (light blue) and ‘ Initially ON’ (light orange) cells, respectively. All fits have R 2 >= 0.77 and MSE < 0.005. A total of 2000 simulations were performed. (inset) Estimated values of the biofilm activation rate ( k ON ) and of the matrix deactivation rate assuming pulsing and constant 0A~P input .

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Changes in Spo0A~P pulsing frequency control biofilm matrix deactivation

doi: 10.1101/2025.02.13.638117

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Pulsing (blue) and constant (orange) 0A~P signal used as input to the biofilm matrix production stochastic model. Pulsing signal corresponds to the signal for growth rate equal to 0.4 h −1 predicted by the phosphorelay network model. The constant 0A~P signal corresponds to the mean of the pulsing signal. (B) Stochastic simulations starting from biofilm matrix inactive state for both constant and pulsing 0A~P signal. Matrix production is considered inactive if the number of TapA molecules < 200 (dashed line). (C) Stochastic simulations starting from matrix active state for both constant and pulsing 0A~P signal. Matrix production is considered active if the number of TapA molecules ≥ 200 (dashed line). (D) Fraction of active cells as a function of time for constant (dark orange) and pulsing 0A~P signal (dark blue) estimated from fitting and to the stochastic simulation data of ‘ Initially OFF cells ’ (light blue) and ‘ Initially ON’ (light orange) cells, respectively. All fits have R 2 >= 0.77 and MSE < 0.005. A total of 2000 simulations were performed. (inset) Estimated values of the biofilm activation rate ( k ON ) and of the matrix deactivation rate assuming pulsing and constant 0A~P input .

Article Snippet: The stochastic model was implemented in MATLAB R2023b, and the stochastic simulations ( ) were done using the SimBiology tool of MATLAB R2023b.

Techniques: Activation Assay

Histogram of TapA molecules obtained from 3000 stochastic simulations (blue bars). Simulation time was set to 50 h. Solid lines represent Gaussian fits derived from a Gaussian Mixture Model with 2 components fitted to the data. The value of 200 molecules was set to be the threshold to distinguish between a biofilm matrix production active and inactive.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Changes in Spo0A~P pulsing frequency control biofilm matrix deactivation

doi: 10.1101/2025.02.13.638117

Figure Lengend Snippet: Histogram of TapA molecules obtained from 3000 stochastic simulations (blue bars). Simulation time was set to 50 h. Solid lines represent Gaussian fits derived from a Gaussian Mixture Model with 2 components fitted to the data. The value of 200 molecules was set to be the threshold to distinguish between a biofilm matrix production active and inactive.

Article Snippet: The stochastic model was implemented in MATLAB R2023b, and the stochastic simulations ( ) were done using the SimBiology tool of MATLAB R2023b.

Techniques: Derivative Assay

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Changes in Spo0A~P pulsing frequency control biofilm matrix deactivation

doi: 10.1101/2025.02.13.638117

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: The stochastic model was implemented in MATLAB R2023b, and the stochastic simulations ( ) were done using the SimBiology tool of MATLAB R2023b.

Techniques:

Fig. 2. In vivo Near Infrared Imaging following Subcutaneous Administration. C57/black mice were administered SA + saline, SA-bNP or bNP + saline SC into the right footpad ( n = 3 each group). Injection volume was 40 μL in each group through a 28G needle. SA was loaded onto bNPs by incubation with an approximately 2x molar excess of SA: bNP surface biotin for 30 minutes. Unbound SA was washed from particles by centrifugation and decanting supernatant 2x. SA + saline was injected at the calculated maximum biotin binding on bNPs. T = 0 SA + saline dose was higher than SA-bNP dose due to incomplete binding of SA on bNP and washing steps to remove unbound SA. Observed fluorescence in the 700 nm channel for SA + saline (A) and SA in SA-bNP (B), and in the 800nm channel for bNP in SA-bNP (C) and unloaded bNPs (D). Normalized injection site elimination profiles vs time for SA + Saline (E ), SA in SA-bNP (F) bNP in SA-bNP (G ), and bNP + saline (H). I, Elimination rate constants from injection site. Data was fitted to a 1-compartment PK model utilizing Matlab symbiology. J, Area under the curve for free and bound SA in the injection site were calculated from concentration vs time data. ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗p < 0.05, < 0.01, and < 0.001 respectively, by 1-way ANOVA or two-tailed T-test.

Journal: Acta biomaterialia

Article Title: Modeling the kinetics of lymph node retention and exposure of a cargo protein delivered by biotin-functionalized nanoparticles.

doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.08.048

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 2. In vivo Near Infrared Imaging following Subcutaneous Administration. C57/black mice were administered SA + saline, SA-bNP or bNP + saline SC into the right footpad ( n = 3 each group). Injection volume was 40 μL in each group through a 28G needle. SA was loaded onto bNPs by incubation with an approximately 2x molar excess of SA: bNP surface biotin for 30 minutes. Unbound SA was washed from particles by centrifugation and decanting supernatant 2x. SA + saline was injected at the calculated maximum biotin binding on bNPs. T = 0 SA + saline dose was higher than SA-bNP dose due to incomplete binding of SA on bNP and washing steps to remove unbound SA. Observed fluorescence in the 700 nm channel for SA + saline (A) and SA in SA-bNP (B), and in the 800nm channel for bNP in SA-bNP (C) and unloaded bNPs (D). Normalized injection site elimination profiles vs time for SA + Saline (E ), SA in SA-bNP (F) bNP in SA-bNP (G ), and bNP + saline (H). I, Elimination rate constants from injection site. Data was fitted to a 1-compartment PK model utilizing Matlab symbiology. J, Area under the curve for free and bound SA in the injection site were calculated from concentration vs time data. ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗p < 0.05, < 0.01, and < 0.001 respectively, by 1-way ANOVA or two-tailed T-test.

Article Snippet: Modeling and simulations MATLAB Simbiology 2018 (Natick, MA) module was utilized to imulate the elimination of SA and bNP from the SC injections.

Techniques: In Vivo, Imaging, Saline, Injection, Incubation, Centrifugation, Binding Assay, Concentration Assay, Two Tailed Test

Fig. 4. Modeling Lymph Node Occupancy from In Vivo Data up to 21 Days. Observed versus predicted concentration vs time curves fitted to the developed 2-compartment model utilizing MatLab symbiology for SA + saline footpad kinetics (A ), SA in SA-bNP footpad and dLN kinetics (B&C ), bNP + saline footpad kinetics (D ), and bNP in SA-bNP footpad and dLN kinetics (E&F).

Journal: Acta biomaterialia

Article Title: Modeling the kinetics of lymph node retention and exposure of a cargo protein delivered by biotin-functionalized nanoparticles.

doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.08.048

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 4. Modeling Lymph Node Occupancy from In Vivo Data up to 21 Days. Observed versus predicted concentration vs time curves fitted to the developed 2-compartment model utilizing MatLab symbiology for SA + saline footpad kinetics (A ), SA in SA-bNP footpad and dLN kinetics (B&C ), bNP + saline footpad kinetics (D ), and bNP in SA-bNP footpad and dLN kinetics (E&F).

Article Snippet: Modeling and simulations MATLAB Simbiology 2018 (Natick, MA) module was utilized to imulate the elimination of SA and bNP from the SC injections.

Techniques: In Vivo, Concentration Assay, Saline